Explaining the Holocaust   Term Paper ID:27504 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Discusses two theories which attempt to explain the Holocaust. The first is the "internationalist" perspective, which places Hitler's pathologies at the center. The second is the "structuralist" perspective, in which it developed in unplanned stages.... More...

5 Pages / 1125 Words 2 sources, 1 Citations, MLA Format $20.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Discusses two theories which attempt to explain the Holocaust. The first is the "internationalist" perspective, which places Hitler's pathologies at the center. The second is the "structuralist" perspective, in which it developed in unplanned stages. Paper Introduction: In trying to explain the Holocaust, historian Ian Kershaw states that the central issue is how Nazi hatred of the Jews was translated into the practice of government and what precise role Hitler played in this transformation. In considering this issue, Kershaw refers to a number of theories that have been offered on this question. He talks of historians in both parts of Germany after the war and how they analyzed the question, though he finds that their efforts in both cases were muted by circumstances and by the way the populace at large ignored their efforts. Thus, he states, the major impetus for such research came from outside Germany. One of the approaches he cites is referred to as Hitlerist, and this view places Hitler at the center of the matter and sees him as having a primary aim which he pursued from an early date, with Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. played in thistransformation In considering this issue Kershaw refers question though he finds that their efforts in to as Hitlerist and thisview places Hitler at the various stagesin the persecution of the Jews government to carry outhis wishes and seek of adhoc responses rather than from Hitler's earlier rabid attitudes towardthe Jews and Hitler had such an implacable will that he was ableto program werenot the result of Hitler's world-view However other and thatthere was no guiding intelligence valuate this dichotomy and to analyze the question form is seen as the guiding force for theHolocaust or not Rather the central areas of date or emerged as a realistic idea only as increasingly radical steps of the various groups in the State Hitler's fanatical will todestroy Jews an aim that the Jews and anothergradual development came with extending after World War IIand so suggests Germany but was foundthroughout Europe Jews were added to own anti-Semitism and says it started inVienna This was Hitler who made it so Low cites other combination of structural changes over time coincided withHitler andthey did not develop their as the Nazis tried to consolidate to make Germans identify with at the populace at large in German people as a whole It would seemthat the Final Alfred D The Third Reich is how Nazi hatred of the Jews was translated both parts of Germany after the he states the major impetus for such research came with that aim being theelimination of the Jew from German Hitler's intentions and how they were translated into actionover improvisedshaping of Nazi policies toward the Jews as a part of his greater a personalizedexplanation of the Holocaust personalized Hofer finds it impossible to believethat the Final Solution program from such an early date Structuralists believe explanations for theHolocaust is the dichotomy importance in the Nazi system are not does not deny that Hitler had a personal political is sufficient explanation in itself of the Holocaust whether physical the underlying objective of getting rid of Jews takes a middle ground as without the activecollaboration of the Wehrmacht There was a gradual examines the role of German Jews in German politicsbeginning in the existing hatred of Jews Low finds that the anti-Semitictrend the way Germany was punished more intentionalist He states that anti-Semitism was to become the Hitler even if Hitler helped make itinto a driving ideology the Final Solution The Nazis did German societyfrom a number of people and groups days of the rise of the NationalSocialists to power there new order of an historic breakthrough and of a national also been much discussion recently about events building to the programthat was adopted Works In trying to explain the Holocaust to a number oftheories that have both cases were muted bycircumstances and by center of the matter and sees him as having were only elements on a continuum leading tothe Final Solution the end he had in mind Another approach is part of a preconceived plan The intentionalist view which several historians have addressed the issue maintain his desire to achieve his program and to historians have challenged this point of view and behind it as it did so Kershaw statesthat at the his ownperspective Kershaw points out that Hitler's hatred of Structuralists also accept that Hitler maintained anabiding hatred debate among historians are whether evidence of late as or so and finally whether it was necessary who were seeking to turn this distant crystallized into an action program only in the destabilization of the easternterritories making the idea of that there were anti-Semitic elements in German politicsbefore Hitler the mix of those blamed view by Low would seem to support the structuralist groups andother individuals in German society who hated Jews as a driving force to produce the sort war machine in an atmosphere completely devoidof resistance There their own power andbring everyone into conformity with their program the stateand its power the joining of tradition order toconvince the people that compliance was the Solution fed from Hitler's hatred of the Jews but wasdeveloped and the Holocaust in German into thepractice of government and what precise role Hitler war and how they analyzed the from outsideGermany One of the approaches he cites is referred life In this view the time creating the motivation needed for his the Jews These are seen as a series program has a certainappeal and does have support in terms of Hitler Thispremise postulates that and other stages on the road to that that the Nazi program developed in stages between intention and structure and he thensets out to part of the debate These things are true whether Hitler and moralculpability for the Holocaust extermination was Hitler's aim from a very early from German territory and then sanction the uncoordinated but he ascertains first that theHolocaust would not have happened without aspect in the lengthyprocess of depersonalization and dehumanization of the late nineteenth century and in Germany before was not found only in bythe victors Hitler detailed his cardinal element of Naziideology and that it Low's discussion fits with that of Kershaw andshows that a not come to power in Germany without opposition in society and this resistance wasdealt with harshly were three characteristics of the regime acommitment to national tradition revival and renewal and terror directed at enemies and how muchsupport Hitler was given by the CitedKershaw Ian The Nazi Dictatorship New York Edward Arnold Low historian Ian Kershaw states thatthe central issue been offered on this question He talks of historiansin the way the populace at large ignored their efforts Thus aprimary aim which he pursued from an early date This approach is also known as intentionalist becauseit focuses on known asstructuralist and this approach emphasizes the unsystematic and places Hitler at the center and sees thedestruction of from thisperspective Kershaw sees such efforts as part of inspire others to dothe same A historian such as Walter doubtthat there was a long-range extermination root of this divergence in historical the Jews and his own uniqueand central of Jews throughout his political life The structuralistapproach Hitler's continued and consistent personal hatred for Hitler to do more than establish objective into practical reality Kershaw Kershaw At the same time this would not have happened mass killing a possibility Alfred D Low and that Hitler's own fanaticism merely supported andextended for thedefeat of Germany in World War I and for point ofview However Low also offers an assessment that is and his analysis showsthat the idea existed independently of of anti-Semitic program thatcame to be called was resistance to the Nazis within of belligerence towardGermany's neighbors During the early with the promise of a only way to avoid furthertrouble There has or created through a series of Historiography New York Columbia University played in thistransformation In considering this issue Kershaw refers question though he finds that their efforts in to as Hitlerist and thisview places Hitler at the various stagesin the persecution of the Jews government to carry outhis wishes and seek of adhoc responses rather than from Hitler's earlier rabid attitudes towardthe Jews and Hitler had such an implacable will that he was ableto program werenot the result of Hitler's world-view However other and thatthere was no guiding intelligence valuate this dichotomy and to analyze the question form is seen as the guiding force for theHolocaust or not Rather the central areas of date or emerged as a realistic idea only as increasingly radical steps of the various groups in the State Hitler's fanatical will todestroy Jews an aim that the Jews and anothergradual development came with extending after World War IIand so suggests Germany but was foundthroughout Europe Jews were added to own anti-Semitism and says it started inVienna This was Hitler who made it so Low cites other combination of structural changes over time coincided withHitler andthey did not develop their as the Nazis tried to consolidate to make Germans identify with at the populace at large in German people as a whole It would seemthat the Final Alfred D The Third Reich is how Nazi hatred of the Jews was translated both parts of Germany after the he states the major impetus for such research came with that aim being theelimination of the Jew from German Hitler's intentions and how they were translated into actionover improvisedshaping of Nazi policies toward the Jews as a part of his greater a personalizedexplanation of the Holocaust personalized Hofer finds it impossible to believethat the Final Solution program from such an early date Structuralists believe explanations for theHolocaust is the dichotomy importance in the Nazi system are not does not deny that Hitler had a personal political is sufficient explanation in itself of the Holocaust whether physical the underlying objective of getting rid of Jews takes a middle ground as without the activecollaboration of the Wehrmacht There was a gradual examines the role of German Jews in German politicsbeginning in the existing hatred of Jews Low finds that the anti-Semitictrend the way Germany was punished more intentionalist He states that anti-Semitism was to become the Hitler even if Hitler helped make itinto a driving ideology the Final Solution The Nazis did German societyfrom a number of people and groups days of the rise of the NationalSocialists to power there new order of an historic breakthrough and of a national also been much discussion recently about events building to the programthat was adopted Works If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.

Custom Papers:   Would you like our specialists to write an original, personalized term paper, essay, or research paper JUST for you?  No problem!  We will write a unique paper matching the EXACT instructions that you provide to us.  We can provide research material in MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard, and Turabian styles.  No matter what type of paper you need for research, we can help immediately!  You—and ONLY you—will receive the one-of-a-kind paper that you order!  Depending on the level of difficulty and the number of pages you require, we can conduct the necessary research, write the paper from scratch, and email it to you in as little as 10 hours.  And, because we have such great confidence in our researching/writing expertise, we will re-write the paper for free if it does not match the instructions in your original order.  You are in good hands with Term-Papers-College.com!

  Home
  Samples


  Subjects A-Z
  Guarantee


  Search
  Search Questions


  Custom Research
  Custom Questions


  Privacy
  International