SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN WORKPLACE.   Term Paper ID:26674 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Legal analysis of major cases shaping definition & treatment of harassment & hostile work environment for both women & men.... More...

10 Pages / 2250 Words 7 sources, 10 Citations, MLA Format $40.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Legal analysis of major cases shaping definition & treatment of harassment & hostile work environment for both women & men. Paper Introduction: INTRODUCTION Sexual harassment in the workplace has always been a problem and has always been of great importance, but the public's awareness of the issue has not always been high. This changed radically with the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings in 1991 and with the accusations of sexual harassment leveled against him by Anita Hill. This event more than any other catapulted sexual harassment to a high position in the public consciousness and made it clear that such activities were degrading to women, harmful to the work environment, and detrimental to public policy. The fact that this problem had been underground for so long also showed that more knowledge of the subject was needed and perhaps that legislation was required to assure a harassment-free workplace in the future. However, precisely what defines Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. hearings in and with the accusations of sexual such activities were degrading to women harmful tothe work environment future However precisely what definessexual harassment has actionbut in a hostile environment Woerner and Oswald form of discrimination LEGAL ISSUES The of thislegislation but was added at v Train some ten years year later in Corne v Bausch Lomb Inc in case Tomkins v Public Service Electric and Gas Co harassment was actionable under Title VII and thatretaliatory acts were requested by the supervisor as were imposed bythe employer in tangible losses and the term itself was rarely generalpublic had also become more bank stating that Vinson was a areinseparable negating any defense on the part of as well and differing interpretations of the meaning of by anindividual who does not have supervisory responsibility picture of the situation More law andcollective bargaining agreements The legal journal and considerthe legislative history and the court decision idea They analyzethe cases that have been handed down and such a history as in the case of sexual to differencesseen between courts Woerner and Oswald to the federal courts andfinally to the Supreme Court the that do indeed show the courts alteringdirection over time The of their discussion and then show how thecourts changed or what makes them change asthey apparently did on of thelaw regarding this issue at the time the article hand and court decisions on the other when on a legislative history to knowthe intent of does not explain why the courts began to change clearly do not have an explanation that can be supported hasmade it easier to win sexual harassment subjected to sexualinnuendo and demeaning comments by the environment Now the Court says the workof the employee Plaintiffs do not have to prove the discriminatory conduct its severity take heart from this ruling to the degree noting The court sent a and said that Justice O'Connor's hostile or abusive standard gives little to solve theproblems involved The Supreme Court's sexual v Forklift Systems Inc actually gavesomething to both By not requiring proof of psychological by eliminating the requirement that a ambiguities and to give employers a proper guideline SEXUAL victims as well Between and the number hostile-environment harassment in which a man a complaint is made Verespej A major ruling in which held that employers may be held legal right tobring claims of sexual harassment when they and than it answered For instance other nondiscriminatory reason The Supreme Court opinion in Harris v Forklift Systems Inc U S not exposed Jarin and Pomfret In the case of Oncale the eight-man crew Two of thecrewmembers had supervisory authority sexual harassment Theplaintiff's claim was dismissed by the trial and for the firsttime the Court unequivocally what constitutes sexual harassment changes from and is to be eliminated has Working Environment HR Focus March Jarin for Clear Policy Paper Film Foil Converter March Verespej View Through the Eyes of the Courts but the public's awareness of the issuehas not always been sexual harassment to a high position in the public that more knowledge ofthe subject was needed and perhaps years It has evenexpanded to cross gender lines and to means unwanted sexually oriented behavior by someone in of which prohibits sexual discrimination in the workplace true intent of Congress in the matteris not known The being the type purposed by the Act the Arizona Federal District Court rejected thesuit as In Williams v Saxbe the D Costle held that the plaintiff could establish a case sexual advances were imposedas a behalf of a plaintiff The EEOC guidelinesdefined sexual and hostile working environments The attitude sexualharassment once in a case Meritor Savings Bank v this ruling and found Capital Savings liable based onEEOC guidelines claim of sexual harassment The issue of a employer is liable if the liable in such acase CURRENT SITUATION Woerner and suggested that the figures would be evenhigher if other avenues The future direction the issue may take they never so state anddo not appear there to be a legislativehistory on which be if it existed This has contributed tothe conflicting decisions subsequent cases have beenbased and they perceive as having taken influenced the courts They do not isa cause-and-effect relationship at work however The authors do notdiscuss offering anysupport for this view The overall analysis though gives legislationalike The article hints at The authorsmay be assuming that their readership knows what this not make this overt in their discussion That issue alone had gone before Perhaps there is no way to Inc which refined and expanded employee concernedabout sexual harassment or an employer concerned about being rejectedthe stricter standard used before it had required plaintiffs to might be considered physicallythreatening or demeaning hostile or abusive work environment within certain parametersdefining unreasonably interferes with an employee's work performance ways to avoid problems down the road though many exactly what it is MacArthur Justice AntoninScalia said that would invite more litigation court was determined to duck the not a reconstruction of sexual harassment and hostile working suits At the same time the apparent rejection of the Jackson What the Court has not done is provide a males has been on the increase so that these lawshave while total yearly complaints doubled to Another gender by braggingconstantly about sexual activities or continuing Court decision in Oncale v Sundowner conflict among several federal appellatecourts which had disagreed precise effects the ruling would have onemployers show that they wereharassed because of their because a harasser used words thatwere sexual or terms or conditions of employmentto forcibly subjected to a series of humiliating stated in his lawsuit that he asked that his this decision was upheld by the circuitcourt The sexual harassment is not to given that it keeps changing running afoul of the law today Works CitedFlaxman Leo John An Empty Ruling on Harassment U S News W L and S L Oswald October INTRODUCTION Sexual harassment in the workplace has always been harassmentleveled against him by Anita and detrimental to public policy The fact that had to be determined by legislation and courtdecisions and examine the court response to the issue Theybegin with the topic has evolved in the lower courts based on Title the last minute as an attempt to preventpassage after passage and the District Court of which twofemale employees claimed constructive discharge afederal court strengthened the Arizona by a supervisor toward a female employee for refusing a factor injob-retention Tomkins was also overturned that year establishing a sexually discriminatory manner Under Title VII the used The case of Bundy v Jackson created enlightened as indicated by various surveys Up to the Supreme willingparticipant as she admitted On appeal the the employer and that awoman need not prove resistance this have been handed downby different courts Another issue over the victim and generally cases of sexual harassment were beingreported authors found that the lack ofconsistency in court decisions was While it may seem that theauthors are in show how the attitude of the courthas changed They also harassment the courts are in organize their material in a clear fashion beginning same route that would be authors imply that changes in the direction after that It is this issue but they imply that public consciousnessof the issue was written and shows howthe law has been Woerner and Oswald notethat there was a lack Congress and thus to decide the issue in part direction seemingly as agroup or why subsequent decisions had HOSTILE WORKPLACE The Supreme Court made a decision suits How one views this case andits effects may president of the company over a two-year period She that other factors should be involved among that they suffered anemotional injury any longer They must show whether it is physically threatening or humiliating that theparameters have now been set message that ittakes sexual harassment seriously little guidance to judges and juries whomust decide whether conduct harassment decision was short fast unanimous sides The Supreme Court's ruling in harm the Supreme Court made it easier for plaintiffs fact-finder must review workplace conduct from the exclusive HARASSMENT OF MALES Sexual harassment laws were written largely with of sexual-harassment complaints filed by men with theEqual Employment or a woman creates ahostile environment terms of harassment on the job liable for same-sex harassment under Title VII their alleged harasserswere of the same gender This decision expanded employees who claim they wereharassed has never held that workplaceharassment even when it occurs between the court stated that t he critical issue is whether v Sundowner Offshore Services a formerroustabout on an off-shore oil and the plaintiff stated that hiscomplaints were not addressed by court because prior caseswithin the court's jurisdiction held that stated that same-sex harassment was unlawfulunder Title VII time to time Business has stated not changed Businessneeds to do whatever it can to control Kenneth M and Ellen K Pomfret Employment Law Michael A New-age Sexual Harassment An Increasing Number of Labor Law Journal Zachary Mary-Kathryn high This changed radically with the Clarence Thomasconfirmation consciousnessand made it clear that that legislation was required to assurea harassment-free workplace in the see harassment not in direct theworkplace It is legally defined as a Sex discrimination was not included in the original draft first case litigated under this statute was Barnes The next case was a not being what was intended by the Act In the C FederalCourt held that sexual prima facie case byshowing that sexual favors condition of employment and these sexual advances harassment Until sexual harassment suits wererestricted to of the courts had by now changed dramatically and the Vinson The firstcourt ruled in favor of the The court found that the employer and his agent hostile environment was raised in these cases unwelcome sexual advances are made Oswald conclude that the current environment shows amixed of retribution were counted such as tort isunpredictable Woerner and Oswald analyze the issue in a to shape their discussion to support that the court can base any decision Without that have been handed down and then moving through the state courts placewith reference to specific cases say this but theypresent surveys in the midst their views of how the courts operate a good sense of the state the dynamic that exist between legislation onthe one means that thecourts lack the necessary guidance based explains much of the confusion in the court decision butit explain that and Woernerand Oswald the concept of the hostile workplace This sued In that case a young woman was repeatedly show severe psychological injury brought on by a hostile work or whether that behavior interfered with what is hostile These may include the frequency of Harris v Forklift Employers can employersdo not see the issue this way wrote a separate concurring opinion MacArthur Some critics of the decision believe the Court did prickly issues involved Leo The decision in Harris environment principles The court's opinion focused on issues of proof reasonable woman standard favors employers definition that is clear enough toavoid been deemed to apply to males as type ofharassment on the increase is homosexual harassment and same-gender to use offensive languageor pinups even after Offshore Service Inc S Ct as to whether employees had the Some feared that the ruling might ultimately create morequestions sex rather than for some had sexual connotations Following Justice Ginsberg'sconcurring which members of the other sex are andsexually-related actions by three of termination slipstate that he voluntarily left because of Supreme Court however unanimously reversed be tolerated but thedefinition of but in fact the essential point that sexualharassment is wrong Howard R and Brian F Jackson New Considerations for Hostile World Report November MacArthur Malcolm D Sexual-harassment Ruling Prompts Need November Sexual Harassment in the Workplace A a problem and hasalways been of great importance Hill This event more than any othercatapulted thisproblem had been underground for so long also showed so has shifted over the past several fact that sexual harassment is difficult to define Itgenerally VII of theCivil Rights Act of the Act As a result the the Districtof Columbia rejected the suit as not as a result of physical andverbal sexual advances and argument The courts started tochange direction later that year hissexual advances constituted sex discrimination The case of Barnes v twonecessary elements for a prima facie Equal Employment Opportunity Commission EEOC can pursue a case on in the courts an awareness of acorrelation between sexual harassment Court only addressed the issue of U S Court for the District ofColumbia reversed to sexual overtures to establish a TitleVII that has been raised concerns whetheran the court has found that the employer is not to the EEOC and it is understandable given the difficulty indefining sexual harassment favor of laws on sexual harassment show how important it is for effect deciding whatthe legislative history would with the legislation on which all taken by anylitigation They support the changes public mind based on surveys not at all clear that there and public disapproval has an effect without shaped and guided by court decisions and of legislative history on this issue based on thatintent but Woerner and Oswald do a specific attitude quite counter towhat in Harris v Forklift Systems be determined by whether you are an eventually resigned her job The Supreme Court them thedegree to which the employer's behavior only that their employerallowed a or a mere offensive utterance and whether it more clearly giving employers guidelines tofollow and so even if it can't say is egregious enough to warrant an award ofmoney damages He and vague four strong indicators that the Harris vs Forklift Systems represents a fine-tuning to succeed in hostile environment harassment perspective of a female employee Flaxman and women as victims inmind but harassment of Opportunity Commission EEOC tripled from to nearly for other workers of the same came in March in the U S Supreme of the Civil Rights Act of TheCourt's decision resolved a sexual harassment law though it was unclear what the by an individual of the same sex must still men and women is automaticallydiscrimination because of sex merely membersof one sex are exposed to disadvantageous platform sued for sex discrimination claiming that he was supervisory personnel He finally quithis job and same-sex harassment was notactionable under Title VII and Zachary CONCLUSION The law states that that this makes it difficult to conform to the law employees and the nature of theworkplace itself to avoid New Rules for Same Sex Harassment HR Magazine June Victims Are Men or Same-gender Workers Industry Week May Woerner Same Sex Harassment HR OD hearings in and with the accusations of sexual such activities were degrading to women harmful tothe work environment future However precisely what definessexual harassment has actionbut in a hostile environment Woerner and Oswald form of discrimination LEGAL ISSUES The of thislegislation but was added at v Train some ten years year later in Corne v Bausch Lomb Inc in case Tomkins v Public Service Electric and Gas Co harassment was actionable under Title VII and thatretaliatory acts were requested by the supervisor as were imposed bythe employer in tangible losses and the term itself was rarely generalpublic had also become more bank stating that Vinson was a areinseparable negating any defense on the part of as well and differing interpretations of the meaning of by anindividual who does not have supervisory responsibility picture of the situation More law andcollective bargaining agreements The legal journal and considerthe legislative history and the court decision idea They analyzethe cases that have been handed down and such a history as in the case of sexual to differencesseen between courts Woerner and Oswald to the federal courts andfinally to the Supreme Court the that do indeed show the courts alteringdirection over time The of their discussion and then show how thecourts changed or what makes them change asthey apparently did on of thelaw regarding this issue at the time the article hand and court decisions on the other when on a legislative history to knowthe intent of does not explain why the courts began to change clearly do not have an explanation that can be supported hasmade it easier to win sexual harassment subjected to sexualinnuendo and demeaning comments by the environment Now the Court says the workof the employee Plaintiffs do not have to prove the discriminatory conduct its severity take heart from this ruling to the degree noting The court sent a and said that Justice O'Connor's hostile or abusive standard gives little to solve theproblems involved The Supreme Court's sexual v Forklift Systems Inc actually gavesomething to both By not requiring proof of psychological by eliminating the requirement that a ambiguities and to give employers a proper guideline SEXUAL victims as well Between and the number hostile-environment harassment in which a man a complaint is made Verespej A major ruling in which held that employers may be held legal right tobring claims of sexual harassment when they and than it answered For instance other nondiscriminatory reason The Supreme Court opinion in Harris v Forklift Systems Inc U S not exposed Jarin and Pomfret In the case of Oncale the eight-man crew Two of thecrewmembers had supervisory authority sexual harassment Theplaintiff's claim was dismissed by the trial and for the firsttime the Court unequivocally what constitutes sexual harassment changes from and is to be eliminated has Working Environment HR Focus March Jarin for Clear Policy Paper Film Foil Converter March Verespej View Through the Eyes of the Courts but the public's awareness of the issuehas not always been sexual harassment to a high position in the public that more knowledge ofthe subject was needed and perhaps years It has evenexpanded to cross gender lines and to means unwanted sexually oriented behavior by someone in of which prohibits sexual discrimination in the workplace true intent of Congress in the matteris not known The being the type purposed by the Act the Arizona Federal District Court rejected thesuit as In Williams v Saxbe the D Costle held that the plaintiff could establish a case sexual advances were imposedas a behalf of a plaintiff The EEOC guidelinesdefined sexual and hostile working environments The attitude sexualharassment once in a case Meritor Savings Bank v this ruling and found Capital Savings liable based onEEOC guidelines claim of sexual harassment The issue of a employer is liable if the liable in such acase CURRENT SITUATION Woerner and suggested that the figures would be evenhigher if other avenues The future direction the issue may take they never so state anddo not appear there to be a legislativehistory on which be if it existed This has contributed tothe conflicting decisions subsequent cases have beenbased and they perceive as having taken influenced the courts They do not isa cause-and-effect relationship at work however The authors do notdiscuss offering anysupport for this view The overall analysis though gives legislationalike The article hints at The authorsmay be assuming that their readership knows what this not make this overt in their discussion That issue alone had gone before Perhaps there is no way to Inc which refined and expanded employee concernedabout sexual harassment or an employer concerned about being rejectedthe stricter standard used before it had required plaintiffs to might be considered physicallythreatening or demeaning hostile or abusive work environment within certain parametersdefining unreasonably interferes with an employee's work performance ways to avoid problems down the road though many exactly what it is MacArthur Justice AntoninScalia said that would invite more litigation court was determined to duck the not a reconstruction of sexual harassment and hostile working suits At the same time the apparent rejection of the Jackson What the Court has not done is provide a males has been on the increase so that these lawshave while total yearly complaints doubled to Another gender by braggingconstantly about sexual activities or continuing Court decision in Oncale v Sundowner conflict among several federal appellatecourts which had disagreed precise effects the ruling would have onemployers show that they wereharassed because of their because a harasser used words thatwere sexual or terms or conditions of employmentto forcibly subjected to a series of humiliating stated in his lawsuit that he asked that his this decision was upheld by the circuitcourt The sexual harassment is not to given that it keeps changing running afoul of the law today Works CitedFlaxman Leo John An Empty Ruling on Harassment U S News W L and S L Oswald October If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.

Custom Papers:   Would you like our specialists to write an original, personalized term paper, essay, or research paper JUST for you?  No problem!  We will write a unique paper matching the EXACT instructions that you provide to us.  We can provide research material in MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard, and Turabian styles.  No matter what type of paper you need for research, we can help immediately!  You—and ONLY you—will receive the one-of-a-kind paper that you order!  Depending on the level of difficulty and the number of pages you require, we can conduct the necessary research, write the paper from scratch, and email it to you in as little as 10 hours.  And, because we have such great confidence in our researching/writing expertise, we will re-write the paper for free if it does not match the instructions in your original order.  You are in good hands with Term-Papers-College.com!

  Home
  Samples


  Subjects A-Z
  Guarantee


  Search
  Search Questions


  Custom Research
  Custom Questions


  Privacy
  International